No on San Francisco Proposition E

November 2018 election

Prop E sets aside at least $35 million from the hotel tax to arts and culture. It doesn’t change the amount of tax collected, so it strictly redirects money from the General Fund to these purposes (which already receive money from the General Fund). This deprives the city of budget flexibility to address other pressing challenges.

The hotel tax currently goes completely to the General Fund, half of which funds health and human services. 30 percent — and growing — of this is set aside for specific purposes, limiting City Hall’s ability to respond to current priorities. These set-asides date back to 1935, showing how difficult they can be to remove to improve budget flexibility.

Image for post
Image for post

Prop E would further gum up the system, permanently redirecting $35 million — 1 percent of the non-set-aside General Fund — toward arts and culture programs that can be funded through the normal budgeting process. Those seeking increased spending on arts and culture can elect leaders who commit to doing so. Forcing budgets into the indefinite future to set aside this money endangers today’s current General Fund spending and limits our ability to fund new and effective programs tomorrow.

Written by

Economist. Founder and president of the UBI Center. Studied at MIT and UC Berkeley. YIMBY. Former Google data scientist.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store